Topics
The Importance of Diversification
The Illusion of Diversification: The Myth of the 30 Stock Portfolio
You should still be making money after you stop working
Top 4 Strategies for Managing a Bond Portfolio
6 Ways to Boost Portfolio Returns
Passive Income: What It Is, 3 Main Categories, and Examples
During most of Christian history, churches were supported by taxes, land rents, and benefices. Throughout the Middle Ages, taxes and rents supported the institutions. This ended with the Napoleonic era, when most church lands in Europe were confiscated, and clergy came to be supported by governments.
In the American colonies, churches were supported by local governments until the late 1770s. In 1791 the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution called for disestablishment of all churches and an end to government support. The new method of financing churches became pew rentals, which lasted throughout the nineteenth century. In the years 1900 to 1920 the system of stewardship appeals, pledges, and envelopes arose that is in use today. At present pledging is the major method of raising financial support in mainline Protestantism, and a combination of tithing and pledging is the major method in evangelical Protestantism. Roman Catholicism relies less on these methods and more on voluntary offerings.
Religious Giving in the 1990s
Most religious institutions today get their financial support from giving by members. In a 1993 study of congregations in five denominations (four Protestant groups and the Roman Catholic Church) in America, it was found that 89 percent of all income came through regular contributions from members. The rest came from bequests, income from investments, and small amounts from fees for programs, rental of building space, and fund-raising events (Hoge et al., 1996). Very few congregations receive support from their denominations.
A 1991 study estimated that 72 percent of the funds of religious congregations was used for current operating expenditures, 14 percent was spent on local capital outlays and savings, and 14 percent was donated to other organizations and individuals—usually denominational programs. This agrees with a 1993 study of five denominations in which 13 percent of funds was sent to mission and service programs outside the congregation. Other research demonstrates that this percentage declined gradually from the 1960s to today.
Denominational offices and programs are supported by payments from congregations. Every denomination has a required or suggested payment to regional and national synods, dioceses, and conferences. These offices in turn support seminaries, missionaries, publications, and so on.
Religion is the number one recipient of philanthropic giving in the United States. It receives an estimated 60 percent of all money given (Hodgkinson and Weitzman, 1996). The estimated total of contributions to religion was $44 billion to $49 billion in 1995. Most religious giving goes directly to local congregations, although in 1993 approximately 16 percent of all religious giving by individuals went to groups or causes outside of local congregations, most commonly to mission programs, social service programs, colleges, and seminaries.
The trend in overall religious giving to Christian churches in raw dollars has been moving upward at roughly the rate of inflation since the 1960s. But as a percentage of overall household income of church members, it has fallen gradually. A study of Protestant denominations in 1995 found that the percentage of household income given by members fell gradually from 3.1 percent in 1968 to 2.5 percent in 1992 (Ronsvalle and Ronsvalle, 1996). Catholic trends are largely unknown, since the Catholic Church never releases summary data on contributions.
Denominational Differences
The methods of handing contributions vary from denomination to denomination. Among Christian groups the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (commonly called Mormons) is unique; it requires that members contribute 10 percent of their household income if they are to be in good standing and receive an entrance pass to Mormon temples. Each Mormon member meets with the local clergyman once a year to discuss the member's giving during that year, and the clergyman decides whether to give the person a pass for entering a temple. Due in part to this procedure, Mormon giving is the highest of any Christian group. No other denomination requires giving 10 percent of income (called "tithing") and also checks up on each member once a year. A few other denominations require tithing for being a full member but without any checking up.
The mainline Protestant denominations (Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Lutherans, Methodists, United Church of Christ, Disciples of Christ, and some others) put less emphasis on tithing. They typically have a stewardship campaign in the autumn, during which they ask members to fill out pledge cards saying what they will contribute the following year. Virtually all churches provide envelopes to members so members' contributions can be confidential, yet the treasurer can add them up for the year and send the member an end-of-year receipt for income-tax purposes. Pledging is much less common in small churches in any denomination, since they are usually made up of only a few families who know each other well; thus their financial arrangements are informal. The evangelical Protestant denominations have higher percentages of members who tithe, so they rely less than mainline denominations on annual stewardship campaigns and pledging.
Religious giving in the Jewish community is different, largely because many American Jews see themselves as ethnically Jewish but not religious. Each metropolitan area in the United States has a Jewish federation, which organizes fund-raising. The 200 federations in operation in the United States in the 1990s resemble combined United Way campaigns in each city, and they collectively collect and disburse the vast bulk of Jewish charitable giving. The federations support over 1,000 Jewish organizations and causes, ranging from Jewish schools at all levels to community centers and study trips to Israel. The federations are the main planning and decision-making structure in the American Jewish community.
Synagogues are separate, and they are supported mostly by annual membership dues, which are seen by Jews as akin to school tuition, not as charitable giving. According to a 1990 survey, 41 percent of American Jews were affiliated with a synagogue, and affiliation entails paying annual set dues, typically in the range of $600 to $1,400 for a family. In a typical synagogue, two-thirds to three-fourths of the annual budget is covered by membership dues. In addition, synagogues ask for voluntary contributions and sponsor fund-raising activities. Total philanthropic giving by Jews, apart from synagogue membership dues, is high, estimated at about $1,600 per family in 1990 (Kosmin and Ritterband, 1991).
The amount of money contributed by members in various denominations differs widely, with some contributing five times as much as others. As noted earlier, the Mormons have the highest rate among Christian bodies, followed by several evangelical and pentecostal bodies, then followed by mainline denominations. The Catholic Church has a lower rate of contributions than the Protestant bodies. In 1993 a study estimated that per-household giving to one's congregation averaged $1,696 in the Assemblies of God, $1,154 in the Southern Baptist Convention, $1,085 in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), $746 in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, and $386 in the Catholic Church. Other research shows that Mormon giving and Jewish giving are higher than any of these five.
Influences on Giving
The main explanation for the different rates of contribution is in four factors. First, different religious groups have different levels of personal participation, especially attendance and volunteering. Second, different groups attach different theological meanings to contributions, most importantly regarding whether God will reward the givers with spiritual benefits. Third, conservative and evangelical groups give a higher percentage of total household philanthropic giving to their churches and less to other causes; that is, their giving is more concentrated on the local church. Fourth, some denominations stress the obligation of tithing one's income, while others do not. Also, some nontithing groups stress making an annual pledge befitting the level of one's household income, while others do not. Groups that require tithing or annual pledging have higher levels of giving than others. In all of these causal factors, conservative and evangelical Protestant groups are highest.
Levels of giving by individual members are highly skewed, with a few members contributing the majority of funds in all churches. The formula applies in virtually all congregations that 20 percent of the households contribute 80 percent of the funds. Sometimes it is 25 percent contributing 75 percent.
Trends in the 1990s
The most important trend is that church members and synagogue members have an increasing antiestablishment mood, which weakens their commitment to national denominational structures. Thus decisionmaking is being made increasingly at the local level, less money is being sent to national offices, and national denominational structures are slowly shrinking. The trend has been present since the 1980s. The best guess is that future denominational structures will be less hierarchical and more voluntary.
A second trend is that young adults have weaker denominational loyalty than their elders, so that young adults shift denominations readily (especially within Protestantism and Judaism) and gravitate to local churches whose programs and leaders they like best. This makes financial bases of local churches more volatile and less stable than in the past.
A third trend is a clear growth in endowments for congregations. Although exact numbers are not known, it is clear that bequests, wills, and large gifts to congregations are higher today than ever. The same is true of many denominational programs, so that, for example, foreign missions in mainline Protestant denominations are often supported more than 50 percent by endowment income rather than by current contributions from members.
See alsoChurchof Jesus Christof Latter-day Saints; Judaism; Mainline Protestantism; Roman Catholicism.
Bibliography
Hodgkinson, Virginia A., and Murray S. Weitzman. Giving and Volunteering in the United States, 1996. 1996.
Hoge, Dean R., Charles E. Zech, Patrick H. McNamara, and Michael J. Donahue. Money Matters: Personal Giving in American Churches. 1996.
Kosmin, Barry A., and Paul Ritterband, eds. Contemporary Jewish Philanthropy in America. 1991.
Ronsvalle, John, and Sylvia Ronsvalle. Behind theStained Glass Windows: Money Dynamics in the Church. 1996.
Dean R. Hoge
For instance, a Christian investor may enlist the professional assistance of a Christian investment company, which only offers investments that align with the principles of the faith. Most of these firms avoid investing in companies that are involved with tobacco, adult entertainment, and gambling, for example.
2
The investment strategies advocated by some religious groups are provided below. This list is by no means comprehensive. Keep in mind that they are general guidelines and are in no way meant to represent the exact strategies and obligations of any particular institution or congregation. The interpretations of these investment styles vary and are based on the investor's religion. They may even differ among denominations.
Knowing your priorities—doing good, generating a return, or both—before you dive in will help guide your faith-based investment strategy.
Christian Investors
Do you know the saying that all Catholics are Christians but not all Christians are Catholics? The same principle also applies to investors, including those who belong to the faith. You may see investment principles in these faiths called values-based investing or Biblically Responsible Investing.3
Here's a look at the basic investment styles of two Christian groups: Catholics and Protestants.
Catholics
Investors who adhere to the Catholic faith follow principles outlined by the Catholic Framework for Economic Life. These 10 faith-based guidelines demonstrate how people should take part in the economy and finance—that is, by basing their decisions on "human dignity and the moral law."45
Faithful Catholics who want to put their money to work in a manner consistent with Catholic values often avoid investing in firms that:
- Engage in gender and/or racial discrimination
- Support abortion and contraceptives
- Promote and/or fund embryonic stem-cell research
- Produce weapons of mass destruction
- Take part in the adult entertainment industry6
Instead, Catholic investors favor firms that support human rights, environmental responsibility, and fair employment practices via the support of labor unions.6
Multiple entities provide investment guidance that supports Catholic values, including investment firms and mutual fund firms that adhere to guidelines for investors who aren't able to take the "do-it-yourself" approach. For instance:
- Catholic Investment Services seeks strong returns for its clients while keeping religious principles at the heart of its investment strategy.7 The firm serves a total of 45 Catholic institutions, has a list of 800 restricted companies, and has more than $1 billion in assets under management (AUM).8
- The LKCM Aquinas Fund follows the socially responsible investment (SRI)guidelines set by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. It aims to maximize investor capital in the long term with Catholic investing principles in mind. Established in July 2005, the fund tracks the S&P 500. Its five-year average annual total returns were 10.8% as of June 30, 2022.910
Protestants
Hard work and thriftiness are integral to the traditional Protestant work ethic, so working and saving are often closely related. Protestant denominations include a range of beliefs, from liberal to conservative. But they all share one principle: The faith encourages followers to make investments based on broad Christian values, such as social consciousness.
The investment policies of some of these religious organizations are often easy to find, such as from the guidelines of investment within the Church of England. The church has an Ethical Investment Advisory Group, which provides support in areas relating to investment choices, policies, relationships between investment managers and investors, and investment maintenance.11
The board seeks investment in vehicles that promote the social and ethical concerns of the church and its teachings while excluding companies that engage in a variety of activities, such as:
- Firearms
- Addictive behavior, such as tobacco and gambling
- Adult entertainment
- Embryonic cloning
- High-interest lending, such as payday loans12
There are a number of mutual funds that follow Protestant principles. Here are a couple of examples:
- GuideStone Funds provides investments that are socially screened and based on Christian values. The company serves investors of all kinds, from institutional to individual investors.13 Fund offerings range from U.S. and international equities to fixed income.14 The firm had $17 billion in AUM as of March 31, 2022, making it one of the largest faith-based fund managers in the U.S.15
- New Covenant Funds makes "investment (decisions) consistent with the social-witness principles adopted by the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church." The firm avoids investments in companies involved in gambling, alcohol, and firearm-related issues.
Investing in the Jewish Faith
Jewish values help guide investors who want to align their faith with their investment strategies. Philanthropy and diversification are key principles dictated in the Talmud. Throughout Jewish religious teachings, there are multiple references to the importance of giving and diversification, and those references are a cornerstone guiding the tenets of this faith's investment practices.20
While less formal in terms of guidance than some of the other religions, socially responsible investing is often closely associated with Jewish-oriented investment strategies. This fits into several of the faith's commandments and mitzvot, or good deeds, that lead investors to do good with their money.20This includes investments that address:
- Climate change
- Social justice
- Local or global issues
- The engagement of shareholders20
Mutual funds that follow Jewish investment strategies provide multiple interpretations of Jewish investing. For example:
- The iShares MSCI Israel ETF, or exchange-traded fund (EIS) was launched in March 2008. A non-diversified fund, it invests primarily in Israeli securities that make up and track a market capitalization-weighted index designed to measure the performance of all-sized segments of the Israeli equity market. It had net assets of $149.1 million as of July 25, 2022.21
- For more funds in this vein, the Jewish Funders Network provides the "Greenbook: A Guide to Jewish Impact Investing," a 2021 handbook on investing with Jewish values that includes some strategies and types of assets for investors with such a goal to consider.22
Jewish values help guide investors who want to align their faith with their investment strategies. Philanthropy and diversification are key principles dictated in the Talmud. Throughout Jewish religious teachings, there are multiple references to the importance of giving and diversification, and those references are a cornerstone guiding the tenets of this faith's investment practices.20
While less formal in terms of guidance than some of the other religions, socially responsible investing is often closely associated with Jewish-oriented investment strategies. This fits into several of the faith's commandments and mitzvot, or good deeds, that lead investors to do good with their money.20This includes investments that address:
- Climate change
- Social justice
- Local or global issues
- The engagement of shareholders20
Mutual funds that follow Jewish investment strategies provide multiple interpretations of Jewish investing. For example:
- The iShares MSCI Israel ETF, or exchange-traded fund (EIS) was launched in March 2008. A non-diversified fund, it invests primarily in Israeli securities that make up and track a market capitalization-weighted index designed to measure the performance of all-sized segments of the Israeli equity market. It had net assets of $149.1 million as of July 25, 2022.21
- For more funds in this vein, the Jewish Funders Network provides the "Greenbook: A Guide to Jewish Impact Investing," a 2021 handbook on investing with Jewish values that includes some strategies and types of assets for investors with such a goal to consider.22
$3.2 trillion
Assets under management in Canada's faith-based investment industry in 2020.23
Assets under management in Canada's faith-based investment industry in 2020.23
Does Faith-Based Investing Work?
Faith-based investing can be just as successful (or unsuccessful) as any other investment style. This means there's no guarantee that you generate better returns just because your investments align with your religious principles.
This investment style faces the same challenges as other philosophies do, and faith-based investments are subject to the same amount of risk. Economic conditions, market sentiment, changes in government policy, interest rates, and geopolitical issues are just some of the issues that faith-based investors face.24
That's why it's important to do your own research. While you can find investments that align with your faith, make sure they fit your financial profile, economic situation, and short- and long-term goals, When in doubt, you can always get help from a financial professional who subscribes to your principles. They can recommend stocks, bonds, mutual funds, ETFs, and other investments based on your own situation and faith.
While you can't buy investments from a church, you can donate investments to a church, if you prefer to give rather than to receive. An appropriate gift to your favorite religious institution not only helps support the institution that embodies principles you believe in, but it may also provide a tax deduction in return.25
Estate planning is another way for investors to transfer wealth in a manner that supports personal religious beliefs when they pass away. There are options available in the market if you choose to let your religion help provide guidance for assigning your wealth after your death.
Faith-based investing can be just as successful (or unsuccessful) as any other investment style. This means there's no guarantee that you generate better returns just because your investments align with your religious principles.
This investment style faces the same challenges as other philosophies do, and faith-based investments are subject to the same amount of risk. Economic conditions, market sentiment, changes in government policy, interest rates, and geopolitical issues are just some of the issues that faith-based investors face.24
That's why it's important to do your own research. While you can find investments that align with your faith, make sure they fit your financial profile, economic situation, and short- and long-term goals, When in doubt, you can always get help from a financial professional who subscribes to your principles. They can recommend stocks, bonds, mutual funds, ETFs, and other investments based on your own situation and faith.
While you can't buy investments from a church, you can donate investments to a church, if you prefer to give rather than to receive. An appropriate gift to your favorite religious institution not only helps support the institution that embodies principles you believe in, but it may also provide a tax deduction in return.25
Estate planning is another way for investors to transfer wealth in a manner that supports personal religious beliefs when they pass away. There are options available in the market if you choose to let your religion help provide guidance for assigning your wealth after your death.
The Bottom Line
Faith-based investing is just like any other type of investment philosophy in that it aims to maximize investor returns. The main difference from some other types of investing is the way in which individuals choose their investment professionals and their asset vehicles. Pursuing faith-based investing is not better or worse than traditional, secular investment plans, but doing so allows investors to make selections through the lens of their religious values.
Faith-based investing is just like any other type of investment philosophy in that it aims to maximize investor returns. The main difference from some other types of investing is the way in which individuals choose their investment professionals and their asset vehicles. Pursuing faith-based investing is not better or worse than traditional, secular investment plans, but doing so allows investors to make selections through the lens of their religious values.
What Is an Investment?
An investment is an asset or item acquired with the goal of generating income or appreciation.
An investment is an asset or item acquired with the goal of generating income or appreciation.
What Are Investment Strategies?
The term investment strategy refers to a set of principles designed to help an individual investor achieve their financial and investment goals. It guides an investor's decisions based on goals, risk tolerance, and future needs for capital. These strategies can vary from conservative (where they follow a low-risk strategy with the focus is on wealth protection) to highly aggressive (seeking rapid growth by focusing on capital appreciation). Investors can use their strategies to formulate their own portfolios or do so through a financial professional. Strategies aren't static, which means they need to be reviewed periodically as circumstances change.
The term investment strategy refers to a set of principles designed to help an individual investor achieve their financial and investment goals. It guides an investor's decisions based on goals, risk tolerance, and future needs for capital. These strategies can vary from conservative (where they follow a low-risk strategy with the focus is on wealth protection) to highly aggressive (seeking rapid growth by focusing on capital appreciation). Investors can use their strategies to formulate their own portfolios or do so through a financial professional. Strategies aren't static, which means they need to be reviewed periodically as circumstances change.
What Is Socially Responsible Investing (SRI)?
Socially responsible investing (SRI), also known as social investment, is an investment that is considered socially responsible due to the nature of the business the company conducts. A common theme for SRI is socially conscious investing. Socially responsible investments can be made in individual companies with good social value, or through a socially conscious mutual fund or ETF.
Socially responsible investing (SRI), also known as social investment, is an investment that is considered socially responsible due to the nature of the business the company conducts. A common theme for SRI is socially conscious investing. Socially responsible investments can be made in individual companies with good social value, or through a socially conscious mutual fund or ETF.
What Are Assets Under Management (AUM)?
Assets under management (AUM) represent the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company. In the calculation of AUM, some financial institutions include bank deposits, mutual funds, and cash in their calculations. Others limit it to funds under discretionary management, where the investor assigns authority to the company to trade on their behalf.
Assets under management (AUM) represent the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company. In the calculation of AUM, some financial institutions include bank deposits, mutual funds, and cash in their calculations. Others limit it to funds under discretionary management, where the investor assigns authority to the company to trade on their behalf.
What Is Market Sentiment?
Market sentiment refers to the overall attitude of investors toward a particular security or financial market. It is the feeling or tone of a market, or its crowd psychology, as revealed through the activity and price movement of the securities traded in that market. In broad terms, rising prices indicate bullishmarket sentiment, while falling prices indicate bearish market sentiment.
SPONSOREDWhat Makes This Investment a Suggested Inflation Hedge?In June 2022, U.S. inflation reached 9.1%, a 40-year high. As a result, many investors are increasing their allocations to inflation hedging assets. One such asset that is seeing record demand is fine art. During periods where inflation was over 3%, art historically showed a 13.5% rate of appreciation—beating stocks, and real estate. With Masterworks, it's easy for anyone to invest in art. Get started today with a special Investopedia link.
Market sentiment refers to the overall attitude of investors toward a particular security or financial market. It is the feeling or tone of a market, or its crowd psychology, as revealed through the activity and price movement of the securities traded in that market. In broad terms, rising prices indicate bullishmarket sentiment, while falling prices indicate bearish market sentiment.
What Is Diversification?
Diversification is a risk management strategy that mixes a wide variety of investments within a portfolio. A diversified portfolio contains a mix of distinct asset types and investment vehicles in an attempt at limiting exposure to any single asset or risk.
The rationale behind this technique is that a portfolio constructed of different kinds of assets will, on average, yield higher long-term returns and lower the risk of any individual holding or security.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Diversification is a strategy that mixes a wide variety of investments within a portfolio in an attempt to reduce portfolio risk.
- Diversification is most often done by investing in different asset classes such as stocks, bonds, real estate, or cryptocurrency.
- Diversification can also be achieved by buying investments in different countries, industries, sizes of companies, or term lengths for income-generating investments.
- Diversification is most often measured by analyzing the correlation coefficient of pairs of assets.
- Investors can diversify on their own by investing in select investments or can hold diversified funds that diversify on their own.
Understanding Diversification
Studies and mathematical models have shown that maintaining a well-diversified portfolio of 25 to 30 stocks yields the most cost-effective level of risk reduction. The investing in more securities generates further diversification benefits, albeit at a drastically smaller rate.
Diversification strives to smooth out unsystematic risk events in a portfolio, so the positive performance of some investments neutralizes the negative performance of others. The benefits of diversification hold only if the securities in the portfolio are not perfectly correlated—that is, they respond differently, often in opposing ways, to market influences.
Find out what a hypothetical investment would be worth today.
Diversification Strategies
As investors consider ways to diversify their holdings, there are dozens of strategies to implement. Many of the strategies below can be combined to enhance the level of diversification within a single portfolio.
Asset Classes
Fund managers and investors often diversify their investments across asset classes and determine what percentages of the portfolio to allocate to each. Each asset class has a different, unique set of risks and opportunities. Classes can include:
- Stocks—shares or equity in a publicly traded company
- Bonds—government and corporate fixed-income debt instruments
- Real estate—land, buildings, natural resources, agriculture, livestock, and water and mineral deposits
- Exchange-traded funds (ETFs)—a marketable basket of securities that follow an index, commodity, or sector
- Commodities—basic goods necessary for the production of other products or services
- Cash and short-term cash-equivalents (CCE)—Treasury bills, certificate of deposit (CD), money market vehicles, and other short-term, low-risk investments
The theory holds that what may negatively impact one asset class may be beneficial to another. For example, rising interest rates usually negatively impacts bond prices as yield must increase to make fixed income securities more attractive. On the other hand, rising interest rates may result in increases in rent for real estate or increases in prices for commodities.
Industries/Sectors
There's tremendous differences in the way different industries or sectors operate. As investors diversify across different industries, they become less likely to be impacted by sector-specific risk.
For example, consider the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022.1 This piece of legislation impacts many different industries, though some companies are more impacted than others. Semiconductor manufacturers will be largely impacted, while the financial services sector might feel smaller, residual impacts.
Investors can diversify across industries by coupling investments that may counterbalance different businesses. For example, consider two major means of entertainment: travel and digital streaming. Investors hoping to hedge against the risk of future major pandemic impacts may invest in digital streaming platforms (i.e. positively impacted by shutdowns). At the same time, investors may consider simultaneously investing in airlines (positively impacted by less shutdowns). In theory, these two unrelated industries may minimize overall portfolio risk.
How many stocks do you need to own to be properly diversified? A study published in the Journal of Risk and Financial Management found there are simply too many variables to consider and "an optimal number of stocks that constitute a well-diversified portfolio does not exist".2
Corporate Lifecycle Stages (Growth vs. Value)
Public equities tend to be broken into two categories: growth stocks or value stocks. Growth stocks are stocks in companies that are expected to experience profit or revenue growth greater than the industry average. Value stocks are stocks in companies that appear to be trading at a discount based on the current fundamentals of a company.
Growth stocks tend to be more risky as the expected growth of a company may not materialize. For example, if the Federal Reserve constricts monetary policy, less capital is usually available (or it is more expense to borrow money), creating a more difficult scenario for growth companies. However, growth companies may tap into seemingly limitless potential and exceed expectations, generating even greater returns than previously expected.
On the other hand, value stocks tend to be more established, stable companies. While these companies may have already experienced most of their potential, they usually carry less risk. By diversifying into both, an investor would capitalize in the future potential of some companies while also recognizing the existing benefits of others.
Market Capitalizations (Large vs. Small)
Investors may want to consider investing across different securities based on the underlying market capitalization of the asset or company. Consider the vast operational differences between Apple and Embecta Corporation. As of August 2022, both companies are in the S&P 500, with Apple representing 7.3% of the index and Embecta representing .000005%.3
Each of the two companies will have considerably different approach in raising capital, introducing new products to the market, brand recognition, and growth potential. Broadly speaking, lower cap stocks have more room to grow, though higher cap stocks tend to be safer investments.
Risk Profiles
Across almost every asset class, investors can choose the underlying risk profile of the security. For example, consider fixed-income securities. An investor can choose to buy bonds from the top-rated governments in the world or to buy bonds from nearly defunct private companies that are raising emergency funds. There are considerable differences between several 10-year bonds based on the issuer, their credit rating, their future operational outlook, and their existing level of debt.
The same can be said for other types of investments. Real estate development projects with more risk may carry greater upside than established, operating properties. Meanwhile, cryptocurrencies with longer histories and greater adoption such as Bitcoin carry less risk compared to smaller market cap coins or tokens.
For investors wanting to maximize their returns, diversification may not be the best strategy. Consider "YOLO" (you only live once) strategies where 100% of capital is placed in a high-risk investment. Though there is the higher probably of making life-changing money, there is also the highest probability of losing capital due to poor diversification.
Maturity Lengths
Specific to fixed-income securities such as bonds, different term lengths impact different risk profiles. In general, the longer the maturity, the higher the risk of fluctuations in the bond's prices due to changes in interest rates. Short-term bonds tend to offer lower interest rates; however, they also tend to be less impacted by uncertainty in future yield curves. Investors more comfortable with risk may consider adding longer term bonds that tend to pay higher degrees of interest.
Maturity length is also prevalent in other assets classes. Consider the difference between short-term lease agreements for residential properties (i.e. up to one year) and long-term lease agreements for commercial properties (i.e. sometimes five years or greater). Though there is more security in collecting rent revenue by locking into a long-term agreement, investors sacrifice flexibility to increase prices or change tenants.
Physical Locations (Foreign vs. Domestic)
Investors can reap further diversification benefits by investing in foreign securities. For example, forces depressing the U.S. economy may not affect Japan's economy in the same way. Therefore, holding Japanese stocks gives an investor a small cushion of protection against losses during an American economic downturn.
Alternatively, there may be greater potential upside (with associated higher degrees of risk) when diversifying across developed and emerging countries. Consider Pakistan's current classification as a frontier market participant (recently downgraded from an emerging market participant).4 Investor willing to take on higher levels of risk may want to consider the higher growth potential of smaller, yet to be fully established markets such as Pakistan.
Tangibility
Financial instruments such as stocks and bonds are intangible investments; they can not be physically touched or felt. On the other hand, tangible investments such as land, real estate, farmland, precious metals, or commodities can be touched and have real world applications. These real assets have different investment profiles as they can consumed, rented, developed on, or treated differently than intangible or digital assets.
There are also unique risks specific to tangible assets. Real property can be vandalized, physically stolen, damaged by natural conditions, or become obsolete. Real assets may also require storage, insurance, or security costs to carry. Though the revenue stream is different than financial instruments, the input costs to protect tangible assets is also different.
Diversification Across Platforms
Regardless of how an investor considers building their own platform, another aspect of diversification relates to how those assets are held. Though this not an implication of the investment's risk, it is an additional risk worth considering as it may be diversifiable.
For example, consider an individual with $400,000 of U.S. currency. In all three of the situations below, the investor has the same asset allocation. However, their risk profile is different:
- The individual may deposit $200,000 at one bank and $200,000 at a second bank. Both deposits are under the FDIC insurance limit per bank and are fully insured.
- The individual may deposit $400,000 at a single bank. Only a portion of the deposit is covered by insurance. In addition, should that single bank experience a bank run, the individual may not have immediate access to cash.
- The individual may physically store $400,000 of cash in their home. Though immediately accessible, the individual will not yield any interest or growth on their cash. In addition, the individual may lose capital in the event of theft, fire, or misplacing cash.
The same concept above relates to almost every asset class. For example, Celsius Network filed for bankruptcy in July 2022.5 Investors holding cryptocurrency with the exchange experienced the inability to withdraw or transfer funds. Had investors diversified across platforms, the risk of loss would have been spread across different exchanges.
Consider different strategies to offset technology risk and physical risk. For example, owning both physical gold bars and gold ETFs diversifies your portfolio across various risks. If your physical holdings were to be stolen, at least 100% of your gold ownership was not lost.
Diversification and the Retail Investor
Time and budget constraints can make it difficult for noninstitutional investors—i.e., individuals—to create an adequately diversified portfolio. This challenge is a key reason why mutual funds are so popular with retail investors. Buying shares in a mutual fund offers an inexpensive way to diversify investments.
While mutual funds provide diversification across various asset classes, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) afford investor access to narrow markets such as commodities and international plays that would ordinarily be difficult to access. An individual with a $100,000 portfolio can spread the investment among ETFs with no overlap.
There's several reasons why this is advantageous to investors. First, it may be costly to individually buy securities using different market orders. In addition, investors must then track their portfolio's weight to ensure proper diversification. Though an investor sacrifices a say in all of the underlying companies being invested in, they simply choose an easier investment approach that prioritizes minimizing risk.
Pros and Cons of Diversification
The primary purpose of diversification is to mitigate risk. By spreading your investment across different asset classes, industries, or maturities, you are less likely to experience market shocks that impact every single one of your investments the same.
There are other benefits to had as well. Some investors may find diversification makes investing more fun as it encourages exploring different unique investments. Diversification may also increase the chance of hitting positive news. Instead of hoping for favorable news specific to one company, positive news impacting one of dozens of companies may be beneficial to your portfolio.
However, there are drawbacks to diversification, too. The more holdings a portfolio has, the more time-consuming it can be to manage—and the more expensive, since buying and selling many different holdings incurs more transaction fees and brokerage commissions. More fundamentally, diversification's spreading-out strategy works both ways, lessening both the risk and the reward.
Say you've invested $120,000 equally among six stocks, and one stock doubles in value. Your original $20,000 stake is now worth $40,000. You've made a lot, sure, but not as much as if your entire $120,000 had been invested in that one company. By protecting you on the downside, diversification limits you on the upside—at least, in the short term. Over the long term, diversified portfolios do tend to post higher returns (see example below).
Reduces portfolio risk
Hedges against market volatility
Offers potentially higher returns long-term
May be more enjoyable for investors to research new investments
Limits gains short-term
Time-consuming to manage
Incurs more transaction fees, commissions
May be overwhelming for newer, unexperienced investors
Diversifiable vs. Non-Diversifiable Risk
The idea behind diversification is to minimize (or even eliminate) risk within a portfolio. However, there are certain types of risks you can diversify away, and there are certain types of risks that exist regardless of how you diversify. These types of risks are called unsystematic risk and systematic risk.
Consider the impact of COVID-19. Due to the global health crisis, many businesses stopped operating. Employees across many different industries were laid off, and consumer spending across all sectors was at risk of declining. On one hand, almost every sector was negatively impacted by economic slowdown. On the other hand, almost every sector then benefited from government intervention and monetary stimulus. The impact of COVID-19 on financial markets was systematic.
In general, diversification aims to reduce unsystematic risk. These are the risks specific to an investment that are unique to that holding. Examples of diversifiable, non-systematic risks include:
- Business risk: the risk related to a specific company based on the nature of its company and what it does in the market.
- Financial risk: the risks related to a specific company or organization's financial health, liquidity, and long-term solvency.
- Operational risk: the risk related to breakdowns in the processes of manufacturing or distributing goods.
- Regulatory risk: the risk that legislation may adversely impact the asset.
Through diversification, investors strive to reduce the risks above which are controllable based on the investments held.
Measuring Diversification
It can become complex and cumbersome to measure how diversified a portfolio is. In reality, it is impossible to calculate the actual degree of diversification; there are simply too many variables to consider across too many assets to truly quantify a single measure of diversification. Still, analysts and portfolio managers use several measurements to get a rough idea of how diversified a portfolio is.
Correlation Coefficient
A correlation coefficient is a statistical measurement that compares the relationship between two variables. This statistical calculation tracks the movement of two assets and whether the assets tend to move in the same direction. The correlation coefficient result varies from -1 to 1, with interpretations ranging from:
- Closer to -1: there is strong diversification between the two assets, as the investments move in opposite directions. There is a strong negative correlation between the two variables being analyzed.
- Closer to 0: there is moderate diversification between the two assets, as the investments have no correlation. The assets sometimes move together, while other times they don't.
- Closer to 1: there is strong lack of diversification between the two assets, as the investments move in the same direction. There is a strong positive correlation between the two variables being analyzed.
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation is used to measure how likely an outcome will occur away from the mean. For example, imagine two investments, each with an average annual return of 5%. One has a high standard deviation, which means the investment has a higher chance or returning 20% or -20%. The other investment has a low standard deviation, which means the investment has a higher chance of returning 6% or 4% (returns closer to the mean).
Analyzing standard deviations is one method of tracking diversification to understand the risk profiles across assets. A portfolio full of high standard deviations may have higher earning potential; however, these assets may be more likely to experience similar risks across asset classes.
Smart Beta
Smart beta strategies offer diversification by tracking underlying indices but do not necessarily weigh stocks according to their market cap. ETF managers further screen equity issues on fundamentals and rebalance portfolios according to objective analysis and not just company size. While smart beta portfolios are unmanaged, the primary goal becomes outperformance of the index itself.
Count/Weighting
In its most basic form, a portfolio's diversification can be measured by counting the number of assets or determining the weight of each asset. When counting the number of assets, consider the number of each type for the strategies above. For example, an investor can count that of the 20 equities they hold, 15 are in the technology sector.
Alternatively, investors can measure diversification by allocating percentages to what they are invested in. In the example directly above, the investor has 75% of their equity holdings in a single industry. On a broader portfolio basis, investors more often compare equity, bonds, and alternative assets to create their diversification targets. For example, traditional portfolios tended to skew towards 60% equities, 40% bonds—though some strategies call for different diversification based on age. Now, more modern theories claim there are added benefits in holding alternative assets (for example, 60% equities, 20% bonds, and 20% alternatives).
Example of Diversification
Say an aggressive investor who can assume a higher level of risk, wishes to construct a portfolio composed of Japanese equities, Australian bonds, and cotton futures. He can purchase stakes in the iShares MSCI Japan ETF, the Vanguard Australian Government Bond Index ETF, and the iPath Bloomberg Cotton Subindex Total Return ETN, for example.
With this mix of ETF shares, due to the specific qualities of the targeted asset classes and the transparency of the holdings, the investor ensures true diversification in their holdings. Also, with different correlations, or responses to outside forces, among the securities, they can slightly lessen their risk exposure.
What Are the Benefits of Diversification?
In theory, holding investments that are different from each other reduces the overall risk of the assets you're invested in. If something bad happens to one investment, you're more likely to have assets that are not impacted if you were diversified.
Diversification may result in larger profit if you are extended into asset classes you wouldn't otherwise have invested in. Also, some investors find diversification more enjoyable to pursue as they get to research new companies, explore different asset classes, and own different types of investments.
What Are the Methods of Diversification?
There's many different ways to diversify; the primary method of diversification is to buy different types of asset classes. For example, instead of putting your entire portfolio into public stock, you may consider buying some bonds to offset some market risk of stocks.
In addition to investing in different asset classes, you can diversify into different industries, geographical locations, term lengths, or market caps. The primary goal of diversification is to invest in a broad range of assets that face different risks.
Is Diversification a Good Strategy?
For investors seeking to minimize risk, diversification is a strong strategy. That said, diversification may minimize returns as the goal of diversification is to reduce the risk within a portfolio. By reducing risk, an investor is willing to take less profit in exchange for the preservation of capital.
What Is an Example of Diversification?
Buying an index fund or ETF of the S&P 500 is an example of diversification. The fund will hold an ownership stake in many different companies across different sectors and product lines. These companies may also operate out of different markets around the world.
The Bottom Line
Diversification is a very important concept in financial planning and investment management. It is the idea that by investing in different things, the overall risk of your portfolio is lower. Instead of putting all of your money into a single asset, spreading your wealth across different assets puts you at less risk of losing capital. With the ease of transacting and investing online, it is now incredibly easy to diversify your portfolio through different asset classes and other strategies.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/troypic__troy_segal-5bfc2629c9e77c005142f6d9.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment